Перевод: со всех языков на английский

с английского на все языки

null-type bridge

  • 1 мост

    bridge, axle авто, mobile gantry, ( печи) bridge wall
    * * *
    мост м.
    1. стр. bridge
    наводи́ть (вре́менный) мост — launch [put up, put on] a bridge
    постро́ить мост че́рез, напр. ре́ку — bridge [span], e. g., a river
    свё́ртывать (вре́менный) мост — delaunch a bridge
    2. авто axle
    автодоро́жный мост — motor-road bridge
    мост автомоби́ля, веду́щий — drive axle
    мост автомоби́ля, веду́щий двухскоростно́й мост — two-speed [double-reduction, dual ratio] (drive) axle
    мост автомоби́ля, веду́щий, с повыша́ющей переда́чей — overdrive axle
    мост автомоби́ля, веду́щий, с полуося́ми, разгру́женными на три че́тверти — three-quarter floating (drive) axle
    мост автомоби́ля, веду́щий, с разгру́женными полуося́ми — floating (drive) axle
    мост автомоби́ля, за́дний — back [rear] axle
    мост автомоби́ля, пере́дний — front axle
    мост автомоби́ля, промежу́точный — intermediate axle
    мост автомоби́ля, управля́емый — guiding [leading, steering] axle
    мост а́нкерного колеса́ час.escape wheel bridge
    мост а́нкерной ви́лки час.pallet cock
    а́рочный мост — arch bridge
    бала́нсовый мост час.balance cock
    ба́лочно-консо́льный мост — cantilever beam bridge
    ба́лочный мост — beam bridge
    ба́лочный мост с неразрезны́ми ба́лками — continuous bridge
    ба́лочный мост с разрезны́ми ба́лками — plate-girder bridge
    вентиляцио́нный, капита́льный мост горн.permanent air crossing
    вентиляцио́нный, участко́вый мост горн.district air crossing
    вися́чий мост — suspension bridge
    вися́чий, ка́бельный мост — cable suspension bridge
    вися́чий, цепно́й мост — chain suspension bridge
    возду́шный мост горн. — air crossing, air bridge
    вре́менный мост — temporary bridge
    городско́й мост — town [city] bridge
    двукры́лый мост — double-leaf bridge
    двухъя́русный мост — double-deck bridge
    железнодоро́жный мост — railway bridge
    железобето́нный мост — reinforced concrete bridge
    железобето́нный, моноли́тный мост — cast-in-situ reinforced concrete bridge
    железобето́нный, сбо́рный мост — prefabricated reinforced concrete bridge
    измери́тельный мост эл.(electrical) bridge
    бала́нс измери́тельного моста́ нару́шен — the bridge is off-balance
    вы́звать разбала́нс измери́тельного моста́ — disturb [upset] the balance of a bridge
    измери́тельный мост нахо́дится в состоя́нии равнове́сия — the bridge is at balance
    измери́тельный мост сбаланси́рован — the bridge is at balance
    приводи́ть измери́тельный мост в состоя́ние равнове́сия — balance a bridge
    уравнове́шивать измери́тельный мост — balance a bridge
    измери́тельный, автомати́ческий мост — automatic [self-balancing] bridge
    измери́тельный, безреохо́рдный мост — fixed-resistance bridge
    измери́тельный мост Ви́на — Wien bridge
    измери́тельный, двойно́й мост — double [Kelvin] bridge
    измери́тельный, дека́дный мост — decade bridge
    измери́тельный, дифференциа́льный мост — differential bridge
    измери́тельный мост для измере́ния крутизны́ — transconductance bridge
    измери́тельный, ё́мкостный мост — capacitance bridge
    измери́тельный мост индукти́вностей — inductance bridge
    измери́тельный, квазиуравнове́шенный мост — semi-balanced bridge
    измери́тельный, магази́нный мост — box-type bridge
    измери́тельный мост магни́тной проница́емости — permeability bridge
    измери́тельный, магни́тный мост — magnetic bridge
    измери́тельный, магни́тный мост Ю́инга — Ewing permeability balance
    измери́тельный, многопле́чий мост — multiple-arm bridge
    измери́тельный, нелине́йный мост — non-linear bridge
    измери́тельный, неуравнове́шенный мост — unbalanced [deflection] bridge
    измери́тельный мост переме́нного то́ка — alternating current [a.c.] bridge
    измери́тельный мост по́лного сопротивле́ния — impedance bridge
    измери́тельный мост проводи́мостей — conductance bridge
    измери́тельный, проце́нтный мост — limit bridge
    измери́тельный, равнопле́чий мост — equal-arm bridge
    измери́тельный, резона́нсный мост — resonance bridge
    измери́тельный, реохо́рдный мост — slidewire bridge
    измери́тельный мост сопротивле́ний — resistance bridge
    измери́тельный мост со следя́щей систе́мой — servo-controlled bridge
    измери́тельный мост То́мсона — double bridge
    измери́тельный мост Уи́тстона — Wheatstone bridge
    измери́тельный, уравнове́шенный мост — balanced [null-type] bridge
    измери́тельный мост Ше́ринга — Schering bridge
    мост из станда́ртных элеме́нтов — unit construction bridge
    мост из тру́бчатых элеме́нтов — tubular bridge
    ка́менный мост — stone bridge
    колошнико́вый мост ( доменной печи) — top trestle
    консо́льный мост — cantilever bridge
    косо́й мост — skew [oblique] bridge
    малопролё́тный мост — snort-span bridge
    многопролё́тный мост — multiple-span bridge
    наплавно́й мост — floating [boat] bridge
    мост напо́льной зава́лочной маши́ны — bottom truck
    мост на ра́мных опо́рах — trestle bridge
    мост на сва́йных опо́рах — pile bridge
    неразводно́й мост — fixed bridge
    однокры́лый мост — single-leaf bridge
    однопролё́тный мост — single-span bridge
    отва́льный мост — dumping [conveyer] bridge
    отка́тный мост — traversing [rolling] bridge
    перегру́зочный мост ( доменной печи) — transfer trestle
    пешехо́дный мост — pedestrian overpass
    поворо́тный мост — swing bridge
    подъё́мно-отка́тный мост — rolling lift bridge
    подъё́мный мост — vertical-lift bridge
    понто́нный мост — pontoon bridge
    разводно́й мост — drawbridge, movable bridge
    ра́мный мост — frame [framed-truss] bridge
    раскрыва́ющийся мост — bascule bridge
    сва́йный мост — pile bridge
    мост с ездо́й по́верху — deck [top-road] bridge
    мост с ездо́й по́низу — bottom-road bridge
    мост с ездо́й посереди́не — (half-)through bridge
    ски́повый мост — skip bridge
    совмещё́нный мост — combined bridge
    сталежелезобето́нный мост — steel-reinforced concrete bridge
    станцио́нный пита́ющий мост свз. — battery supply [transmission] bridge, battery supply circuit, battery supply feed
    терми́сторный мост — thermistor bridge
    тра́нспортно-отва́льный мост горн. — transport and dumping [overburden] bridge
    цельносварно́й мост — all-welded bridge
    ши́нный мост эл.busbar bridge
    щелево́й мост элк. — (slot) bridge hybrid, hybrid junction
    щелево́й, свё́рнутый мост элк.folded bridge hybrid
    * * *

    Русско-английский политехнический словарь > мост

  • 2 мост с нулевым отсчетом

    Русско-английский научный словарь > мост с нулевым отсчетом

  • 3 уравновешенный измерительный мост

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > уравновешенный измерительный мост

  • 4 мост с непосредственным отсчетом

    Русско-английский научный словарь > мост с непосредственным отсчетом

  • 5 схема с уравновешенным мостиком

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > схема с уравновешенным мостиком

  • 6 Language

       Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)
       It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)
       It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)
       Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)
       It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)
       [A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]
       Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling it
       Solving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into another
       LANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)
       We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)
       We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.
       The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)
       9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own Language
       The forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)
       It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)
       In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)
       In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)
       [It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)
       he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.
       The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)
       The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.
       But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)
       The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)
        t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)
       A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)
       Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)
       It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)
       First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....
       Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)
       If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)
        23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human Interaction
       Language cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)
       By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)
       Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)

    Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language

См. также в других словарях:

  • Object-relational database — An object relational database (ORD), or object relational database management system (ORDBMS), is a database management system (DBMS) similar to a relational database, but with an object oriented database model: objects, classes and inheritance… …   Wikipedia

  • Rochester, New York — This article is about the city of Rochester in Monroe County. For the town in Ulster County, see Rochester, Ulster County, New York. For the metropolitan area, see Rochester, New York metropolitan area. Rochester   City   …   Wikipedia

  • San Francisco — This article is about the city and county in California. For other uses, see San Francisco (disambiguation). San Francisco   City and county   City and County of San Francisco …   Wikipedia

  • Comparison of C Sharp and Java — The correct title of this article is Comparison of C# and Java. The substitution or omission of the # sign is because of technical restrictions. Programming language comparisons General comparison Basic syntax Basic instructions …   Wikipedia

  • eye, human — ▪ anatomy Introduction  specialized sense organ capable of receiving visual images, which are then carried to the brain. Anatomy of the visual apparatus Structures auxiliary to the eye The orbit       The eye is protected from mechanical injury… …   Universalium

  • Richmond, California — Infobox Settlement official name = City of Richmond, California motto = The City of Pride and Purpose image seal size = 162 mapsize = map caption = subdivision type = Country subdivision name = United States subdivision type1 = State subdivision… …   Wikipedia

  • Skat (card game) — This article is about the German card game. For the American draw and discard card game, see Thirty one (game). Skat A picture of four Unters of German cards …   Wikipedia

  • Operational amplifier — A Signetics μa741 operational amplifier, one of the most successful op amps. An operational amplifier ( op amp ) is a DC coupled high gain electronic voltage amplifier with a differential input and, usually, a single ended output.[1] An op amp… …   Wikipedia

  • PostgreSQL — Developer(s) PostgreSQL Global Development Group Stable release 9.1.1[1] / 9.0.5 …   Wikipedia

  • Queens (New York City borough) — Infobox Settlement name =Queens official name =Queens County other name = native name = nickname = settlement type =Borough of New York City total type = motto = imagesize = image caption = The Unisphere, unofficial symbol of Queens. flag size =… …   Wikipedia

  • Brooklyn — Infobox Settlement name = Brooklyn official name = Kings County other name = native name = settlement type =Borough of New York City total type = motto = imagesize = image caption = View of Brooklyn Heights from South Street Seaport. flag size =… …   Wikipedia

Поделиться ссылкой на выделенное

Прямая ссылка:
Нажмите правой клавишей мыши и выберите «Копировать ссылку»